Welcome to Being a Mediator

The open blog of mediation professionals

educación sexual en adolescentes

SEXUALITY EDUCATION BEFORE THE INTERNET EDUCATES: A NECESSARY TEN COMMANDMENTS  

 

Talking about sexuality with children and teenagers remains uncomfortable for many families, schools, and professionals. Although we live in a seemingly hyper-informed society, it's still difficult to sit down and talk openly about the body, desire, intimacy, boundaries, consent, or relationships. Sometimes it's out of embarrassment, other times out of fear of "giving them ideas," and still other times because we don't quite know how to approach the topic. 

However, adult silence doesn't stop curiosity. Nor does it protect. When a girl or teenager doesn't find answers from the adults they care about, they look for them elsewhere: the internet, social media, videos, friends, forums, pornography, or content created to grab attention, not to educate. The question, therefore, isn't whether minors will receive information about sexuality. The question is from whom they will receive it, with what values, with what intention, and from what perspective. 

The internet can offer useful information, but it can also present a deeply distorted image of sexuality. Many minors access sexual content without yet possessing the emotional, developmental, and critical thinking skills to interpret it. They see bodies, practices, relationships, and scenes that can portray sexuality as performance, dominance, consumption, comparison, or pressure. If no one helps them think about it, they may confuse fiction with reality, desire with obligation, insistence with seduction, or exposure with freedom. 

Sexuality education doesn't mean rushing children or invading their privacy. It means supporting their development. It means offering guidance before confusion arises. It means teaching that one's own body deserves respect, as does the body of others, that no one should feel obligated to do something they don't want to do, and that healthy relationships are built on care, equality, and consent. 

This ten-point guide doesn't aim to offer magic solutions. It aims to remind us of something simpler and more important: if adults don't take their place in education, other narratives will do it for us. 

1. Talking about sexuality doesn't accelerate stages, it accompanies them. 

One of the biggest fears adults have is that talking to children about sexuality might awaken a curiosity they didn't have before. But curiosity is a part of development. Children ask about the body, about differences, about birth, about relationships, and later on, about desire, attraction, and relationships. Their questions don't mean they're ready for adult experiences; they mean they need to understand the world. 

When we avoid answering, we don't eliminate the question. We simply leave the child without a reliable answer. And when a teenager doesn't find a calm explanation at home, at school, or from a trusted professional, they may seek it in less safe places. Silence is not neutral. Silence also teaches, but it teaches shame, secrecy, and the idea that certain topics cannot be discussed with adults. 

Talking doesn't mean explaining everything at once or giving age-inappropriate information. It means responding honestly, simply, and calmly. Sometimes simply naming body parts correctly will suffice. Other times, it will be necessary to talk about intimacy, physical changes, menstruation, erections, sexual orientation, consent, or peer pressure. Each stage requires different language, but all require adult presence. 

Sexuality education is similar to education about nutrition, relationships, or technology use: it can't be resolved in a single conversation. It's built gradually, with consistent messages, availability, and trust. When adults speak naturally, children learn they can ask questions again. 

2. Adapt the language to the age without lying or scaring. 

You don't speak to a seven-year-old boy the same way you speak to a sixteen-year-old girl. This idea seems obvious, but it's sometimes used as an excuse to never speak at all. Adapting language doesn't mean hiding reality, but rather explaining it in a way that is understandable and appropriate. 

In childhood, sex education is closely linked to understanding the body, intimacy, respect, boundaries, and preventing abuse. A child can learn that their body belongs to them, that there are private parts, that no one should touch them in a way that makes them uncomfortable, that they can say no, and that they should tell a trusted adult about any situation that makes them feel bad. All of this is also part of sex education, even if we're not yet talking about sexual intercourse. 

In adolescence, the questions change. Desire, attraction, first relationships, peer pressure, social media, pornography, body image anxieties, doubts about sexual practices, sexual orientation, identity, and consent all emerge. If adults don't address these questions, other, much faster and less thoughtful discourses will. 

It's also important not to educate through fear. If every conversation about sexuality is presented as a threat, teenagers may associate it solely with danger, guilt, or shame. Of course, there are risks, and we must talk about them. But sexuality shouldn't be addressed only in terms of unwanted pregnancy, infections, abuse, or violence. We must also talk about respect, pleasure, care, affection, communication, responsibility, and freedom. 

The key is to tell the truth without dramatizing. To name the risks without turning the body into a problem. To talk about boundaries without instilling fear of all relationships. To explain that sexuality is part of life, but that it requires maturity, respect, and consent. 

3. Teach that one's own body deserves respect 

Before discussing relationships, it's important to talk about the body. How we name it, how we care for it, how we inhabit it, and how we set boundaries. Many subsequent problems stem from insufficient education about the right to make decisions about one's own body. 

From a young age, children should learn that their bodies are not at the service of others. They don't have to give kisses if they don't want to, they don't have to accept caresses that make them uncomfortable, they don't have to endure jokes about their appearance, or allow invasions of their privacy. Sometimes, with good intentions, adults force children to greet others with physical contact or minimize their discomfort. Without realizing it, we can send a confusing message: that the comfort of others matters more than their own boundaries. 

Educating about respect for the body also means being mindful of language. Constant comments about weight, physical development, clothing, appearance, or comparisons to other bodies can leave a lasting mark. In adolescence, when body image becomes so important, these words carry even more weight. A changing body needs to be treated with respect, not ridicule, surveillance, or judgment. 

One's own body deserves care, privacy, and dignity. This idea is fundamental to preventing pressure, abuse, and unequal relationships. A teenager who has learned to recognize their boundaries will be better able to identify when someone crosses them. A teenager who knows that she doesn't have to please at any cost will have more tools to resist emotional, sexual, or digital pressure. 

We must also teach respect for other people's bodies. No one has the right to comment on, touch, harass, photograph, distribute, or use another person's body without their consent. This education should be directed to all children, boys and girls, based on the fundamental idea: my body is mine, but the other person's body also belongs only to them. 

4. Differentiate between desire, pressure, and consent 

One of the most important lessons of adolescence is distinguishing between wanting, giving in, and feeling pressured. Many harmful situations don't begin with an explicit threat, but with insistence, blackmail, silence, anger, or phrases that push someone to do something they don't really want to do. 

Consent is not simply about not saying no. Consenting means being able to say yes freely, without fear, without pressure, and with a real possibility of changing your mind. If someone agrees to something to avoid upsetting the other person, to avoid losing the relationship, to avoid seeming immature, or to stop them from insisting, it is not a free decision. It is a concession conditioned by pressure. 

Teenagers need to be taught that desire isn't something you demand. It's either shared or it isn't. It's not negotiated through insistence. It's not obtained through guilt. It's not demonstrated by doing something someone doesn't want to do. Phrases like "if you loved me, you'd do it," "everyone does it," "you're exaggerating," "you don't trust me," or "you're going to leave me like this" should be recognized as signs of manipulation, not as normal expressions in a relationship. 

It's also necessary to teach that consent can be withdrawn. Saying yes once doesn't obligate you to repeat it. Being in a relationship doesn't mean constant availability. Sending a picture doesn't authorize asking for more. Initiating an intimate situation doesn't prevent you from stopping it. Freedom must be maintained throughout the entire relationship, not just at the beginning. 

Educating about consent is educating about empathy. It means looking at the other person, listening, asking questions, accepting boundaries, and not turning one's own desires into someone else's obligation. This kind of teaching is essential to prevent sexual violence, controlling relationships, and experiences that can generate guilt, fear, or emotional harm. 

5. Explain that pornography is not sex education 

Many children are exposed to pornography before having had an open conversation about sexuality. In some cases, they access it out of curiosity. In others, due to peer pressure. Sometimes it appears accidentally. Other times it becomes a regular source of learning. The problem is that pornography is not designed to educate, but to arouse, sell, and hold attention. 

This isn't about addressing this issue through scandal, but through critical thinking. Pornography presents a representation of sexuality, not real sexuality in all its complexity. Much of it features selectively bred bodies, exaggerated practices, a lack of communication and care, unequal relationships, and a performance-driven view of desire. If a teenager takes this as their primary reference point, they can develop distorted expectations about their own body, other people's bodies, and relationships. 

Pornography can convey the idea that everything should be immediate, intense, readily available, and spectacular. It can reinforce gender stereotypes, normalize pressure, obscure consent, or present practices devoid of emotional context or care. It can also generate body insecurity: boys comparing themselves to unrealistic bodies, girls feeling pressured to meet certain expectations, or teenagers believing that real sexuality should resemble what they've seen on a screen. 

Talking to teenagers about pornography doesn't mean going into unnecessary detail or invading their privacy. It means making it clear that the internet cannot be their primary teacher. It means explaining that what appears in this content doesn't define what they should do, what they should want, or what a relationship should be like. It means helping them ask themselves who produces these images, why, what they show, what they hide, and what the consequences of consuming them without a critical eye might be. 

The message shouldn't just be "that's wrong." It's more helpful to say, "that's not a guide to relationships." Real sexuality requires communication, respect, consent, care, affection, boundaries, and responsibility. None of that can be properly learned in a video designed for quick consumption. 

6. Talking about intimate images, privacy, and social media 

Teenagers' emotional and sexual lives also revolve around mobile phones. Conversations, flirting, conflicts, declarations of love, jealousy, and peer pressure can all take place through social media and messaging apps. Therefore, sex education today necessarily involves education about digital privacy. 

One of the most important issues is the sending of intimate images. Many teenagers are familiar with sexting, but they don't always understand its implications. Sometimes photos are sent as a sign of trust, desire, or belonging to a partner. Other times it's done due to pressure, insistence, or fear of losing the other person. The problem is that, once an image is sent, some control over it is lost. It can be forwarded, captured, shown, or used for blackmail. 

It is crucial to address this issue without blaming the victim. If an intimate image is shared without consent, the responsibility lies not with the person who trusted the source, but with the person who betrayed that trust and violated their privacy. This message must be crystal clear. At the same time, we must help minors understand the real risks of sharing intimate content and how to resist peer pressure. 

We also need to talk to boys directly. It's not enough to tell girls to be careful. We need to teach boys that asking for, pressuring, saving, forwarding, or showing intimate images of another person without their consent is a serious form of violence. Education can't focus solely on girls protecting themselves; it must also focus on boys respecting others. 

Digital privacy is not a technical issue, but an ethical one. It concerns dignity, trust, and the right to privacy. Before forwarding an image, commenting on someone's body, sharing a screenshot, or pressuring someone to send a photo, teenagers should learn to ask themselves a simple question: Do I have the right to do this with someone else's privacy? 

7. Educate the children too 

For too long, many conversations about sexuality have placed the burden of prevention on girls. They're told to be careful, not to expose themselves, to know how to say no, not to trust anyone, to protect their image, to avoid risks. All of that can be important, but it's woefully inadequate if we don't also educate boys about responsibility, care, and respect. 

Boys need spaces where they can talk about desire, insecurity, peer pressure, pornography, masculinity, consent, and emotions. Many grow up surrounded by messages that push them to demonstrate experience, confidence, constant initiative, or dominance. In some groups, sexuality becomes a status symbol. Those who don't meet certain expectations are shown off, exaggerated, competed against, or ridiculed. 

This form of socialization can be harmful to girls, but also to boys. It makes it difficult for them to express doubts, recognize boundaries, accept rejection, or experience sexuality with peace of mind. If a boy learns that his worth depends on demonstrating power or experience, he may have more difficulty relating to others with respect and reciprocity. 

Educating children means telling them clearly that persistence isn't seduction, that pressure isn't flirting, that sharing intimate images isn't a joke, that the other person's desires matter as much as their own, and that a "no" doesn't need explaining. It also means teaching them that they can feel insecure, ashamed, or afraid without turning those emotions into control or aggression. 

Equal sex education doesn't pit boys and girls against each other. It gives everyone better tools for relating to others. It allows them to build relationships less marked by pressure, inequality, and fear. It helps them understand that sexuality shouldn't be a battleground for power, but rather a space for respect. 

8. Don't wait until there's a problem 

Many conversations about sexuality happen too late. They only occur when an image is leaked, abuse is suspected, a controlling relationship is revealed, risky practices are observed, or a situation frightens adults. Then the conversation arises from urgency, fear, or anger. And while intervention is necessary at these times, comprehensive sex education cannot depend solely on crises. 

Prevention needs to start earlier. It should be progressive, a daily practice, and adapted to each stage of life. We don't have to wait until adolescence to talk about boundaries, privacy, and respect. We don't have to wait until a teenager is consuming pornography to explain that the internet doesn't always portray healthy relationships. We don't have to wait until a girl is pressured to send a photo to talk about privacy and consent. 

When the conversation happens before a problem arises, the child is more likely to ask for help. They know the issue can be discussed. They know the adult won't react solely with yelling or punishment. They know they won't be humiliated for asking. That trust can make a huge difference. 

Prevention also means examining our own inconsistencies. We cannot teach respect for the body if we constantly comment on other people's physical appearance. We cannot teach about consent if we force children to accept unwanted physical contact. We cannot teach about equality if we normalize sexist jokes. We cannot teach about privacy if we expose children's lives on social media without asking them. 

Sex education isn't limited to what we say. It's also conveyed through our actions, how we treat others, how we talk about our bodies, how we manage boundaries, and how we react to uncomfortable questions. 

9. Build trust so they can ask questions 

A child will not confide in an adult about something sensitive if they fear being ridiculed, punished, or judged. This doesn't mean adults should approve of everything or abandon boundaries. It means that trust is essential for providing support. 

How we respond to those first questions matters a great deal. If a child asks something about their body and is met with a dismissive answer, they learn that the topic is uncomfortable. If a teenager raises a question and is met with alarm, they learn that perhaps they shouldn't ask again. If a boy expresses insecurity and is ridiculed, he will learn to hide it. Every adult reaction either opens or closes a door. 

Building trust means listening before lecturing. Asking questions before accusing. Thanking them for sharing something difficult. Acknowledging that some situations can be embarrassing. Conveying that asking for help doesn't make anyone guilty. And, when it's necessary to set limits or take action, doing so by explaining the reason and respecting the child's dignity. 

It's also important to accept that we won't always have the perfect answer. You can say, "I don't know how to explain it right now, but we can talk about it," or "I need to think about it before I can give you a proper answer." The important thing is not to shut down the conversation. Teenagers don't need perfect adults; they need available adults. 

Trust isn't something you can improvise in an emergency. It's built in everyday life. In the way you listen, in not making fun of others, in not being scandalized by everything, in respecting privacy, and in showing that important issues can be discussed without the world falling apart. 

10. Coordinate family, school and professionals 

Sex education shouldn't depend on luck. It can't rely solely on a family daring to talk about it, a teacher being sensitive, or a professional finding time to address the topic. Children need consistent messages from various sources. 

The family plays a fundamental role because it is the first place where children learn about their bodies, emotions, boundaries, and trust. However, not all families have the same information, security, or capacity to address these issues. Therefore, schools and socio-educational resources are essential. They do not replace the family, but rather complement, structure, and ensure that all children receive a basic education for their development and protection. 

Professionals working with children and adolescents also have a special responsibility. In schools, child protection services, social service organizations, youth centers, and intervention programs, sex education must be integrated across all areas. Not as an isolated talk, but as part of comprehensive support. 

Coordination doesn't mean everyone saying the exact same thing in the same words. It means sharing a common foundation: respect, equality, consent, care, privacy, critical thinking, and protection from violence. When these messages are repeated from different places, they gain strength. 

It is also important to have access to specialized resources when needed. If there is suspicion of abuse, sexual violence, distribution of intimate images, coercion, problematic pornography use, or controlling relationships, an educational conversation is not enough. Appropriate support services must be activated, the child must be protected, and decisive action must be taken. 

Educate earlier, support better 

Sexuality education isn't about discussing an uncomfortable topic. It's about life, the body, relationships, respect, and care. It's about giving children the tools to understand themselves, protect themselves, and relate better to others. It's about helping them distinguish between desire and pressure, intimacy and exposure, trust and control, fiction and reality. 

We can't expect teenagers to handle complex situations if no one has taught them beforehand. We can't expect them to recognize sexual pressure if we've never talked about consent. We can't ask them to question pornography if it has been their primary source of information. We can't demand digital responsibility from them if we've never discussed privacy, intimate images, and the consequences. 

Comprehensive sex education doesn't eliminate all risks, but it reduces the isolation many young people face. It gives them words. It gives them criteria. It gives them permission to ask questions. It reminds them that their bodies matter, that their boundaries matter, and that no healthy relationship should be built on fear, obligation, or shame. 

When adults are silent, the internet speaks. And it speaks a lot, quickly, and not always well. That's why we need to intervene earlier, not to control children's lives, but to guide them. Because sex education isn't about pushing them to grow up too fast; it's about helping them grow up with more care, more freedom, and more respect.

Would you like to study these and other current topics related to childhood and adolescent development? Learn about the Postgraduate in Intervention with Minors and work on what you really like!

oferta vinculante confidencial

Beyond the offer

Why Mediation Remains the True Path to Agreement By Mar Fernández Organic Law 1/2025 has placed appropriate dispute resolution methods at the heart of the pre-trial phase in civil and commercial proceedings. Among these, the confidential binding offer has become a widely used tool due to its speed and simplicity. But one question is unavoidable: does fulfilling the procedural requirement always equate to genuine negotiation? 1. The Confidential Binding Offer: A Useful Tool, but with Limited Scope The confidential binding offer, regulated in Article 17 of Title II of Organic Law 1/2025, allows one party to make another a closed proposal to resolve a dispute. If the recipient expressly accepts it, the offer becomes binding. If they reject it or fail to accept it within the stipulated timeframe, the offering party may resort to the court, considering the procedural requirement fulfilled. From a practical perspective, its appeal is clear: it's fast, documentable, confidential, and allows for a record of the prior attempt at an out-of-court settlement. For many legal professionals, especially in matters of economic content, it may seem like the most direct way to overcome the pre-trial phase without initiating a broader dialogue. However, its main strength is also its greatest limitation: the binding offer operates on a rigid structure. One party offers; the other accepts or rejects. The intermediate space, which is precisely where true negotiation usually takes place, is greatly reduced. ⚠️ Practical note: A confidential binding offer can be an ideal ADR method when the conflict is very well defined, the financial positions are clear, and the parties only need a final proposal. But not… Read more

apuestas online

ONLINE BETTING AND MINORS: WHEN GAMBLING STOPS BEING A GAME 

 

A malaise that is no longer exceptional 

Talking about adolescence today increasingly means talking about mental health. In recent years, social, educational, and professional concern has intensified regarding the rise in emotional and psychological problems in children, and especially adolescents. Anxiety, self-harm, depressive symptoms, eating disorders, loneliness, difficulties with emotional regulation, and suicidal thoughts are appearing with a frequency that is no longer perceived as exceptional, but rather as a central issue in discussions about childhood and youth. This is not simply a matter of greater sensitivity to detecting psychological suffering—something that certainly plays a role—but rather a shared perception among professionals, families, and child protection systems that something is happening with adolescent distress and deserves to be understood. 

The expression is frequently used anxious generation to describe this reality. Although any label risks oversimplifying complex phenomena, the expression resonates with an increasingly prevalent social intuition: many adolescents are growing up in conditions that seem to foster uncertainty, pressure, excessive demands, and emotional fragility. This isn't because adolescence has ceased to be, as it always has been, a stage marked by crises, contradictions, and quests, but because these developmental experiences are occurring within a particularly demanding and, in many ways, emotionally hostile social context. 

Perhaps one of the first points to emphasize is that we are not dealing with adolescents who are “weaker” than previous generations, as simplistic narratives sometimes suggest, but rather with adolescents growing up in different circumstances, facing new challenges and, at times, with less support to cope with them. Understanding this is crucial to avoid pathologizing adolescence or reducing the debate to supposed individual vulnerabilities. Because much of this unease cannot be explained solely from a psychological perspective; it also needs to be understood from social, educational, and relational perspectives. 

Growing up under pressure: an adolescence marked by high expectations 

One of the recurring elements in analyses of adolescent suffering is pressure. Many young people are growing up in environments where high expectations permeate multiple dimensions of life: academic performance, future expectations, self-image, social relationships, personal success, and even emotional management. The feeling of having to constantly perform, stand out, build a successful life project, and do so within an uncertain context can generate an experience of sustained pressure that is difficult to bear. 

Many teenagers experience a paradoxical situation: they have more opportunities, greater access to information, and seemingly more possibilities than previous generations, but they also perceive that the margin for error is smaller, that the future is uncertain, and that expectations are enormously high. This pressure doesn't always appear as an explicit demand from their environment; often it is internalized and operates as a constant self-imposed demand. 

This logic has significant effects on mental health. Anxiety doesn't arise solely from traumatic events or specific difficulties; it often develops in contexts where daily demands overwhelm the resources available to cope. When mistakes are experienced as failures, when rest generates guilt, or when constant comparison makes any achievement seem insufficient, distress can become a habitual way of functioning. 

From this perspective, talking about anxious teenagers also forces us to ask ourselves about a culture that often normalizes levels of pressure incompatible with healthy growth processes. 

Social media, comparison, and emotional vulnerability 

While adolescent distress cannot be reduced to the impact of social media, it is difficult to understand current changes without considering its influence. Much of the adolescent experience now takes place in digital spaces where comparison, exposure, and the search for validation are part of everyday life. These environments are not simply settings where pre-existing insecurities are expressed; in many cases, they also contribute to intensifying them. 

Social media introduces a particularly complex logic to a developmental stage marked by identity formation and sensitivity to social recognition. Constant exposure to seemingly perfect lives, idealized bodies, perpetually visible success, or relationships portrayed through highly edited versions can generate profoundly draining comparison processes. The problem lies not only in the content itself, but also in the frequency, intensity, and omnipresence with which these stimuli become part of daily life. 

Many teenagers today grow up under a kind of constant scrutiny, where the perception of being observed, evaluated, or potentially compared doesn't disappear when they leave school or their peer group, but continues in the digital space. This also transforms their experience of insecurity, rejection, or belonging. 

Furthermore, certain technological designs based on immediate rewards, quantifiable validation, and constant overstimulation can influence emotional regulation, frustration tolerance, and the relationship with boredom, silence, and waiting. All of this creates a scenario that can intensify pre-existing vulnerabilities and generate new forms of distress. 

It is not about making social networks the sole explanation, but rather about recognizing that they are part of the emotional context in which adolescence grows up today. 

Loneliness, disconnection, and fragility of relationships 

Another element that runs through many analyses of adolescent distress is the paradox of a hyperconnected generation that, nevertheless, frequently expresses profound feelings of loneliness. Although forms of relationship have multiplied, this does not always translate into stronger bonds or deeper experiences of belonging. 

Increasingly, studies and professional accounts point to feelings of isolation, emotional disconnection, and difficulty building secure relationships as significant components of adolescent suffering. This is especially important because adolescence is a stage where belonging, mutual recognition, and bonds are profoundly protective. 

Adolescent loneliness doesn't always take the visible form of isolation. Sometimes it manifests as a feeling of being unable to show vulnerability, a fear of not measuring up, experiences of being misunderstood, or difficulty finding spaces where one can express discomfort without feeling judged. 

In a world where many interactions are accelerating and face-to-face time is becoming less frequent, it's no surprise that difficulties arise in maintaining deep connections. And when these connections weaken, suffering finds fewer outlets for containment. 

Thinking about adolescent mental health also involves thinking about the quality of the bonds we are offering. 

When discomfort becomes a symptom 

One of the most worrying issues is that, in many cases, adolescent suffering finds no words, support, or spaces where it can be processed, and ends up being expressed through the body or behavior. Self-harm, certain eating disorders, problematic substance use, or risky behaviors can sometimes be understood as ways of managing pain that has found no other outlet. 

This is especially important for those working with children, because it requires interpreting certain behaviors not only as problems to be corrected, but also as potential expressions of suffering. Often, what appears as behavioral challenges, withdrawal, or other symptoms actually expresses deeper distress that requires listening and understanding. 

There is also the risk of responding to these manifestations solely through pathologizing lenses. While it is undeniable that many adolescents need clinical attention, not all suffering can be reduced to a diagnosis. Sometimes we medicalize experiences that also reflect social contexts, structural pressures, or unmet relational needs. 

Recognizing this does not mean downplaying suffering, but rather addressing it with greater complexity. 

The role of families, schools, and intervention systems 

Given this scenario, one of the central questions is how to provide support. And here it becomes crucial to shift the focus from "what is happening to teenagers" to "what contexts are we building so they can grow.". 

Mental health isn't just a matter of therapy. It also happens in families where distress can be discussed without fear, in schools that offer care and support, not just high expectations, in communities with protective bonds, and in intervention systems capable of providing support before suffering becomes chronic. 

Preventing mental health problems in adolescents involves more than just increasing specialized resources—though this is essential—; it also means strengthening protective everyday environments. These are spaces where young people can take a break from pressure, where not everything revolves around performance, where making mistakes doesn't mean failing, and where asking for help isn't seen as a weakness. 

For those who work with minors, this also represents an invitation to view adolescent distress not only as a clinical problem, but as an educational, relational, and social issue. 

Listening to teenagers to understand what's going on 

Sometimes debates about youth are built on talking about teenagers rather than listening to them. However, understanding what is happening requires precisely paying attention to their experiences, their fears, and their ways of naming their unease. 

Many teenagers express fear of the future, exhaustion under pressure, difficulty sustaining impossible expectations, or a feeling of not living up to what is expected of them. Others speak of anxiety as an almost normalized state, difficulty stopping, or living in a constant state of alert. 

Listening to these stories forces us to take seriously the possibility that we may not only be facing individual problems, but also symptoms of a social model that produces unease. 

And this reflection challenges not only those who work in mental health

Would you like to study these and other current topics related to childhood and adolescent development? Learn about the Postgraduate in Intervention with Minors and work on what you really like!

adicción a las redes

SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION IN ADOLESCENTS: BETWEEN CONNECTION AND DEPENDENCE  

 

A generation connected since childhood 

Social media is an integral part of teenagers' daily lives. It's not a secondary addition or simply a form of entertainment: it's a space where they communicate, showcase themselves, compare themselves to others, stay informed, build their identity, seek recognition, and belong to a group. For many young people, being on social media isn't just about "passing the time," but about participating in an important part of their social world. 

Therefore, when we talk about addiction or dependence on social media, it's important to proceed with caution. It's not about demonizing technology or portraying teenagers as passive victims of screens. Social media can have positive uses. It allows us to maintain connections, share interests, access information, express creativity, find support communities, and participate in social causes. The problem isn't the existence of social media itself, but rather how it's used, the time it consumes, the emotional function it serves, and the degree of control teenagers exert over it. 

Adolescence is a particularly vulnerable stage because it coincides with an intense search for identity and external validation. The opinions of others take on enormous importance. Being liked, fitting in, being accepted, not being left out, and receiving recognition can become very present needs. Social media amplifies these dynamics because it offers constant exposure and immediate feedback: likes, comments, views, followers, messages, mentions, or even silence, all of which are interpreted. 

In this context, some teenagers begin to develop a dependent relationship with social media. They don't just use it to communicate or be entertained, but to regulate their mood, escape discomfort, avoid loneliness, calm anxiety, or feel valued. When a mobile phone becomes their primary emotional refuge and disconnection generates irritability, distress, or emptiness, we are no longer just talking about frequent use, but about a problematic relationship. 

From normal use to problematic use 

Not all heavy social media use is addiction. This distinction is important because teenagers live in a deeply digitalized environment. They study, socialize, make plans, consume culture, and participate socially through devices. Simply saying that they "use their phones a lot" is not enough to speak of dependence. 

Problematic use arises when social media begins to occupy a disproportionate place in a teenager's life and affects important areas of their development. This can manifest as a loss of control over screen time, difficulty putting down their phone even when they want to, abandonment of meaningful activities, reduced face-to-face contact, sleep problems, a decline in academic performance, frequent family conflicts, or emotional distress when they cannot access social media. 

The key lies not only in how many hours are spent online, but also in what happens when they're not. A teenager might spend a lot of time online for social, academic, or leisure reasons and still maintain other interests, get adequate rest, maintain in-person relationships, and disconnect without significant distress. Conversely, another teenager might use social media for fewer hours but experience it with compulsive need, constant anxiety, and emotional dependence. 

Social media platforms are designed to capture attention. Constant updates, notifications, short videos, personalized algorithms, and variable rewards ensure there's always something new to look at. Teenagers don't just log into the app; the app keeps them there. The feeling that the next video, message, or post might be more interesting makes it hard to close. Often, they don't leave the screen because they lack the willpower, but because the digital environment itself is built to prolong their engagement. 

This does not eliminate educational responsibility, but it does require a deeper understanding of the phenomenon. We are not dealing solely with a "lack of discipline." We are facing a combination of technological, emotional, social, and developmental factors that make it very difficult for some adolescents to self-regulate. 

The need to be available all the time 

One of the most visible characteristics of social media addiction is the feeling of constant availability. Many teenagers feel they must respond quickly, stay up-to-date, see what's happening, reply to messages, react to posts, and not miss a single conversation. Disconnection is experienced as a form of social disappearance. 

This is where the familiar fear of missing out, FOMO, comes into play. It's understood as the anxiety that arises from the possibility that others are having experiences, conversations, or forming relationships that one isn't participating in. In adolescence, where belonging to a group is so important, this fear can be especially intense. Not checking your phone can mean missing out on a plan, not responding in time, not reacting to a joke, not seeing a story before it disappears, or not participating in a group conversation. 

This pressure creates a relationship of constant surveillance. The teenager checks their phone even when there are no notifications. They unlock it automatically. They interrupt tasks, meals, conversations, or moments of rest to check for updates. Sometimes they don't even enjoy what they see, but feel the need to look. 

Constant availability also affects privacy and rest. Previously, home could be a space to disconnect from peers. Today, social interactions spill into the bedroom, the bed, the early hours of the morning, and moments of vulnerability. A conflict, a comparison, or an unpleasant comment can occur just before sleep. The adolescent mind remains active when it should be preparing for rest. 

Sleep is one of the most affected areas. Many boys and girls delay bedtime to stay connected, watch videos for long periods, or wake up to check their phones. Lack of sleep affects mood, concentration, memory, school performance, and the ability to regulate emotions. It is often addressed as a behavioral problem, but it is also a health and developmental issue. 

Self-esteem, comparison, and the search for validation 

Social media offers a constant window into other people's lives. But that window doesn't show the whole picture; it shows a curated selection. Pleasant moments, attractive physiques, appealing plans, achievements, trips, friendships, parties, witty remarks, and carefully crafted versions of oneself are all posted. Even though teenagers may rationally understand that social media doesn't reflect the whole of reality, they can emotionally compare themselves to what they see. 

Constant comparison can profoundly affect self-esteem. A teenage girl might feel that her body doesn't fit in, that her life is boring, that she has fewer friends, that she doesn't receive enough attention, or that she doesn't meet certain standards of beauty, success, or popularity. A boy might measure his worth by his number of followers, his ability to be funny, his physique, his performance, or the image of confidence he projects. 

The problem isn't just comparing oneself to others, but doing so in an environment where validation is quantified. Likes, comments, views, and followers turn social approval into visible numbers. This can create an emotional dependence on external recognition. A post that receives little response can be experienced as rejection. A story that isn't seen by a particular person can be interpreted as disinterest. A single negative comment can occupy more emotional space than dozens of positive replies. 

In some cases, teenagers begin to construct their image based on what garners the most approval. They post what they think will be liked, delete what doesn't work, modify how they present themselves, and become trapped in a kind of constant evaluation. The question ceases to be "Who am I?" and becomes "Which version of me receives the most acceptance?". 

This dynamic can be especially problematic for children who are insecure, have low self-esteem, experience relationship difficulties, have suffered rejection, or lack emotional support. Social media can become a quick source of validation, but also a space that increases dependence on external validation. The more approval is needed, the more vulnerable the person becomes to comparison, rejection, and pressure. 

When social media functions as an emotional refuge 

Many teenagers don't use social media just for fun. They use it to avoid thinking, to avoid feeling lonely, to escape conflicts, to calm anxiety, to fill silences, or to avoid uncomfortable emotions. In these cases, social media functions as an external emotional regulator. 

This isn't always a bad thing. We all seek distractions when we're tired or worried. The problem arises when this strategy becomes the primary or only way of managing discomfort. If every moment of sadness, boredom, frustration, or anxiety is masked by a screen, the teenager doesn't develop other tools for coping with their feelings. 

Compulsive screen time can mask unmet needs. Sometimes it stems from loneliness. Sometimes it stems from a lack of meaningful activities. Sometimes it stems from family problems, academic difficulties, body insecurity, conflicts with peers, or a lack of spaces to talk. Screens don't create all of these problems, but they can temporarily mask them and make it harder to address them. 

Therefore, limiting screen time may be necessary, but not sufficient. If the phone is taken away without understanding its purpose, irritability, anxiety, or resistance may increase. The educational question shouldn't just be "How much time are you online?", but also "Why do you need to be online?", "How do you feel when you can't look at your phone?", "What are you avoiding when you keep going online?". 

When social media serves as an emotional refuge, intervention must expand alternatives. Prohibition is not enough. It's necessary to offer spaces for connection, activities that foster self-esteem, opportunities for participation, healthy routines, meaningful conversations, and emotional regulation strategies. The goal is not simply for the adolescent to use their phone less, but to become less dependent on it for well-being. 

Signs that may indicate dependence 

Social media addiction doesn't appear overnight. It usually develops gradually. At first, it may seem like regular use, but little by little, changes in behavior, mood, and the organization of daily life become noticeable. 

A key warning sign is a loss of control. The teenager says they'll check their phone for five minutes and ends up staying connected much longer. They try to cut down, but can't manage it. They resolve to put it down before bed and fall back into the same pattern. This loss of control is often accompanied by feelings of guilt or frustration, although these aren't always openly expressed. 

Discomfort may also arise when the child doesn't have access to the device. Irritability, nervousness, anger, restlessness, or a feeling of emptiness may occur when the battery is low, the connection is lost, or the phone is taken away. In some cases, the family interprets these reactions as mere defiance, but it's important to observe whether there is a genuine emotional dependence on the connection. 

Another sign is the displacement of other activities. The teenager stops doing things they previously enjoyed, reduces face-to-face contact, abandons hobbies, avoids going out, neglects responsibilities, or loses interest in non-digital activities. It's not that social media is their only form of entertainment, but rather that it begins to take the place of everything else. 

The impact on sleep and academic performance should also be a concern. Sleeping poorly due to being online, studying with constant interruptions, being unable to concentrate without checking notifications, or delaying tasks due to watching videos and reading posts are all signs that internet use is interfering with daily functioning. 

Finally, it's important to pay attention to their emotional state. If, after using social media, the teenager appears sadder, more anxious, irritable, insecure, or more prone to comparing themselves to others, it's worth examining what's going on. Sometimes social media doesn't produce any positive effects, yet it continues to be used compulsively. This combination—discomfort and difficulty stopping—is particularly significant. 

The role of families: to support rather than persecute 

Families play a vital role, but it's not always easy. Many mothers and fathers feel they've arrived too late, that they don't understand the apps, that their children know more than they do, or that any attempt to set limits ends in conflict. This feeling can lead to two extremes: total permissiveness or rigid control. Neither usually works on its own. 

Accompanying someone doesn't mean invading their space. Nor does it mean letting them do whatever they want without guidance. It means taking an interest in the teenager's digital life with the same naturalness with which you ask about their friendships, their studies, or their activities. Asking what social media they use, what they like to watch, who they talk to, what makes them feel good or bad, which influencers they follow, or what kind of content they see shouldn't be seen as spying, but rather as part of educational support. 

Dialogue is more effective when it doesn't begin with judgment. If every conversation about social media starts with reproaches, the teenager will likely withhold information. On the other hand, if they sense genuine curiosity, they may open up more. This doesn't mean abandoning boundaries, but rather building them on a foundation of trust. 

Limits are necessary. Adolescence doesn't eliminate the adult responsibility to set rules. But they must be clear, proportionate, and consistent. It makes no sense to demand that a teenager not use their phone at the table if the adults are texting during meals. Nor does it help to arbitrarily prohibit things without explaining the reason. Rules should protect sleep, studying, social interaction, privacy, and emotional well-being. 

Protecting nighttime is especially important. Rest shouldn't depend solely on adolescent self-regulation, because many apps are designed to make it difficult to disconnect. Removing phones from the bedroom, establishing screen-free times, or creating family routines without screens can be a form of care, not punishment. 

Educational and professional centers: educating in digital citizenship 

Schools and socio-educational resources also play a vital role. For years, the adult response to social media has focused too much on prohibiting or warning of dangers. However, teenagers need more than alarmist messages. They need digital literacy, critical thinking skills, and the ability to navigate these spaces in a healthy way. 

Educating people about digital citizenship means talking about privacy, identity, algorithms, disinformation, self-esteem, consent, image exposure, digital violence, peer pressure, and digital footprint. It means helping them understand that social networks are not neutral spaces, but environments designed with economic interests, capable of influencing attention, desire, opinion, and behavior. 

It's also important to explore the relationship between social media and emotions. We often talk about external risks—contact with strangers, image sharing, cyberbullying—but less about the internal impact: comparison, anxiety, dependence on validation, difficulty being bored, loss of concentration, or the need for constant availability. 

Professionals working with teenagers can create spaces for reflection where they are not treated as guilty, but as active participants capable of analyzing their own experiences. Asking them how they feel after using social media, what content harms them, what they find addictive, what they would like to change, or what rules they consider reasonable can be more transformative than imposing rigid narratives. 

Prevention must be ongoing. A single talk can raise awareness, but it won't change deeply ingrained habits. Digital literacy needs to be integrated into tutoring, coexistence programs, family intervention, emotional education, and spaces for adolescent participation. 

It's not about turning off the digital world, but about regaining control. 

One of the most common mistakes is framing the debate as if there were only two options: allow everything or prohibit everything. The reality is more complex. Social media is part of today's world, and teenagers need to learn how to use it, not just how to avoid it. The goal shouldn't be to isolate them from technology, but to help them regain control over their attention, their time, their image, and their well-being. 

Healthy use of social media allows you to come and go without anxiety. It allows you to enjoy yourself without being dependent on it. It allows you to communicate without being constantly demanding an immediate response. It allows you to share without turning your identity into a permanent showcase. It allows you to stay informed without losing your critical thinking skills. It allows you to be entertained without neglecting rest, studies, your body, and face-to-face relationships. 

To reach that point, teenagers need present adults, not just watchful ones. They need boundaries, but also role models. They need rules, but also alternatives. They need someone to help them understand why they find it so hard to switch off, without reducing it all to laziness or a lack of willpower. 

Disconnecting shouldn't be seen solely as a form of resignation. It should become an opportunity to rediscover other experiences: sleeping better, having uninterrupted conversations, playing sports, creating, being bored, reading, walking, meeting up with friends, participating in activities, being silent, or simply not being available all the time. 

Conclusion: Accompany digital life to take care of real life 

Social media addiction in teenagers cannot be understood solely as an individual problem. It is the result of a vulnerable developmental stage, intense emotional needs, constant social pressure, and platforms designed to capture attention. Therefore, the solution cannot be simple either. 

It's not enough to simply say "put down your phone." We need to understand what role that phone plays in the teenager's life. It might be for leisure, refuge, a way to express themselves, a connection, a means of comparison, a sense of belonging, an escape, or validation. Only by understanding this function can we intervene effectively. 

Social media isn't inherently the enemy, but it can become a source of dependency when it replaces rest, self-esteem, face-to-face interaction, concentration, or the ability to be alone. The challenge lies in helping teenagers use it without becoming trapped by it. 

Guiding children in their digital lives is now an essential way to nurture their real lives. It means educating them about boundaries, critical thinking, self-esteem, privacy, rest, and healthy relationships. It means reminding them that no teenager should measure their worth in likes, followers, or views. And it means conveying a fundamental idea: being connected can be positive, but constantly checking a screen shouldn't prevent them from living fully offline. 

Would you like to study these and other current topics related to childhood and adolescent development? Learn about the Postgraduate in Intervention with Minors and work on what you really like!

Violencia de género

GENDER VIOLENCE IN TEENAGE COUPLES: WHEN CONTROL IS CONFUSED WITH LOVE  

 

 

When we talk about gender-based violence, we often think of adult relationships, long-term cohabitation, marriages, or complex family situations. However, gender-based violence can also appear in early romantic relationships, in those first romantic partnerships formed during adolescence, which, precisely because they are the first, have a tremendous influence on how boys and girls learn to relate to others, to love, and to be loved. 

Adolescence is a stage of discovery. It's a time when young people begin to experience desire, intimacy, attraction, the need to belong, the search for identity, and the construction of their own image in the eyes of others. In this context, first romantic relationships can be experienced with great intensity. Everything seems definitive, urgent, absolute. An unanswered message can generate anxiety, an argument can feel like the end of the world, and a show of attention can easily be mistaken for a declaration of love. 

The problem arises when that emotional intensity is mixed with misconceptions about love. When jealousy is interpreted as a sign of interest. When control is mistaken for care. When possessiveness is experienced as a form of commitment. When a teenage girl comes to believe that her partner controls her because he loves her so much, or when a boy understands that having a girlfriend means having the right to decide who she talks to, how she dresses, where she is, or what she posts online. 

Gender-based violence in teenage relationships doesn't usually begin with obvious physical aggression. It generally starts more subtly, almost imperceptibly, through small comments, demands, anger, reproaches, or emotional blackmail that gradually limit the girl's freedom. At first, they may seem like "couple stuff," normal arguments, or signs of insecurity. But when these behaviors are repeated, generating fear, guilt, or a loss of autonomy, they cease to be typical relationship conflicts and become part of a dynamic of violence. 

Romantic love as a risky terrain 

One of the factors that most contributes to the normalization of violence in teenage relationships is the persistence of certain myths about romantic love. Although society has made significant progress in the discourse on equality, deeply damaging ideas about what it means to love still circulate. Many films, songs, television series, social media posts, and everyday stories continue to convey that to love is to suffer, that jealousy is inevitable, that a true relationship must be extremely exclusive, or that the partner must be all-consuming. 

In adolescence, these ideas can have a particularly strong impact. The need to be chosen, the fear of rejection, and peer pressure lead some girls to accept behaviors that make them uncomfortable because they believe they are part of a normal relationship. Sometimes, a "real" couple is interpreted as needing to respond quickly to messages, share passwords, tell absolutely everything, give up certain friendships, or always prioritize the other person above any other relationship. 

This view of love doesn't teach freedom, but dependence. It doesn't teach how to build healthy relationships, but rather relationships based on possession. Instead of understanding a couple as a space of mutual care, respect, and growth, it becomes a space where one person watches and the other adapts to avoid conflict. 

A healthy relationship doesn't require you to disappear as a person. It doesn't force you to abandon friendships, change the way you dress, stop doing activities, hide your opinions, or live constantly worried about bothering others. Love shouldn't generate fear. Nor should it make a teenager feel like she has to ask permission to be herself. 

That's why it's so important to work with teenagers on a clear idea: loving someone doesn't give you the right to control their life. Love isn't about possessing. Love isn't about monitoring. Love isn't about making decisions for the other person. A loving relationship can be intense, exciting, and meaningful while still remaining respectful. 

The most frequent forms of control 

In teenage relationships, gender-based violence often manifests itself through forms of control that may initially go unnoticed. It doesn't always involve shouting, insults, or physical aggression. Often, control is disguised as concern. "I'm telling you this for your own good." "I don't like you hanging out with those people." "If you loved me, you wouldn't do that." "You don't need to go out, just stay and talk to me." "Send me a picture so I know where you are." "Show me your phone if you have nothing to hide.". 

These phrases may seem isolated, but when they become a recurring pattern, they create an unequal relationship. The girl begins to modify her behavior to avoid anger. She stops posting certain photos, replies more quickly, distances herself from some friends, changes her style of dress, or avoids plans she used to enjoy. Little by little, her world shrinks. 

Digital control has intensified this problem. Before, a person could monitor their partner in specific physical spaces. Now, that control can be constant. Social media, instant messaging, geolocation, and the need to be always available have opened up new forms of surveillance. Knowing if someone is online, if they've read a message, who they've followed, who has liked their posts, or where they are can become a constant source of pressure. 

In many teenage relationships, there's a demand for immediate availability. Not responding within minutes can lead to arguments, accusations, or suspicion. Other behaviors include checking your phone, demanding passwords, or insisting on deleting contacts. These aren't signs of trust; quite the opposite, they reflect a relationship built on suspicion and control. 

Another worrying aspect is the control over their image. Some teenage girls receive comments about how they should dress, what photos they can post, or what parts of their body they can show. Their partner might criticize a skirt, a neckline, a pose, a photograph, or even their makeup. The girl may end up internalizing that she must adapt her image to avoid conflict, as if her body or her public presence also belonged to her partner. 

Violence can also occur in the sexual sphere. In some relationships, there is pressure to have sex, send intimate images, or engage in practices the girl does not want. Sometimes this pressure is exerted through emotional blackmail: "If you loved me, you would do it," "All couples do it," "If you don't want to, it's because you don't like me," "If you don't send me a picture, it's because you don't trust me." This type of coercion is especially serious because it affects the freedom, privacy, and dignity of the adolescent. 

When the victim does not recognize themselves as a victim 

One of the biggest challenges in detecting gender-based violence in adolescence is that many girls don't recognize what they're experiencing as violence. They may feel bad, overwhelmed, sad, or guilty, but they don't necessarily interpret the relationship as abusive. This happens for several reasons. 

First, because there is a very limited understanding of violence. Many teenage girls associate violence only with hitting, serious threats, or visible aggression. If there is no physical violence, they may think that "it's not that bad." However, psychological violence, control, humiliation, isolation, and emotional pressure are also forms of violence, even if they don't leave physical marks. 

Secondly, because the relationship often has positive moments. The boy might be affectionate, apologize, promise to change, show vulnerability, or alternate between controlling behavior and displays of affection. This alternation creates confusion. The teenager might think that the good parts of the relationship outweigh the painful ones, or that if she acts differently, she can avoid conflict. 

Third, because guilt plays a central role. In abusive relationships, the victim often ends up feeling responsible for what happens. She believes that if she had responded sooner, if she hadn't gone out, if she hadn't posted that photo, or if she hadn't spoken to a certain person, the argument wouldn't have occurred. The abuser shifts the responsibility onto her and makes her believe that her behavior justifies the control. 

Furthermore, peer pressure carries significant weight during adolescence. Sometimes the relationship is embedded within a circle of friends, at school, on social media, or in shared spaces. Ending the relationship can mean exposure to rumors, loss of friends, social pressure, or fear of being judged. There may also be fear of being alone, of not being believed, or of having what happened minimized. 

That's why it's not enough to simply tell a teenager "leave it" or "that's not good for you." From the outside, it might seem obvious, but from the inside, the situation is usually much more complex. Adult intervention should begin with understanding, not reproach. If the girl feels judged, she'll likely withdraw. If she feels heard, she can begin to put words to what she's experiencing. 

Warning signs that should concern us 

Detecting gender-based violence in teenage relationships requires looking beyond the obvious incidents. Sometimes the signs appear in small changes in behavior. A teenager who previously participated in activities begins to isolate herself. A girl who stops seeing her friends. Abrupt changes in her style of dress. Constant anxiety about responding to messages. Fear of upsetting her partner. Loss of spontaneity. Continuous justification of the other person's behavior. Decline in academic performance. Irritability, sadness, or a feeling of emotional exhaustion. 

A gradual loss of autonomy may also be observed. The teenager consults her partner about everything, avoids making decisions without him, or seems to need his approval for everyday plans. She may appear tense when receiving messages, hide arguments, downplay humiliating comments, or defend her partner even when she feels bad. 

Sometimes, friends notice something is wrong before the victim herself. They see how she changes, how she stops being herself, how she withdraws, or how she's constantly on her phone. However, they don't always know how to react. They might pressure her to end the relationship, get angry with her for going back to her partner, or distance themselves out of frustration. While these reactions are understandable, they can increase the girl's isolation. 

Adults should also pay attention to phrases that normalize control. Expressions like “he’s very jealous because he loves me,” “he doesn’t like me going out with my friends,” “he’d rather I didn’t post photos,” “he gets angry if I take too long to reply,” or “he asked for my password because he says couples don’t have secrets” should be taken seriously. The point is not to panic over every teenage conflict, but to assess whether there is a pattern of dominance, fear, or restriction of freedom. 

The key isn't in an isolated incident, but in its repetition and the effect it produces. All couples can argue. Everyone can feel insecure at some point. But when a relationship causes a woman to lose her freedom, feel constantly guilty, or fear her partner's reaction, we're dealing with a situation that requires attention. 

The role of boys: to also educate on healthy masculinities 

Talking about gender-based violence in teenage relationships doesn't mean labeling all boys as aggressors. It means acknowledging that models of masculinity still exist that teach some boys to relate to others through dominance, possessiveness, or a sense of superiority. And above all, it means recognizing that prevention also involves working with them. 

Many teenagers have grown up receiving contradictory messages. On the one hand, they hear speeches about equality. On the other, they continue to be exposed to role models who associate masculinity with control, emotional toughness, sexual competitiveness, or the need to demonstrate power. In some groups, controlling one's partner can even be seen as a form of self-affirmation. The boy who "lets his girlfriend do what she wants" is ridiculed, while the one who boasts about dominating the relationship is praised. 

It's crucial to teach children that a relationship isn't built on surveillance, but on trust. That feeling jealous doesn't justify control. That an emotion doesn't excuse harmful behavior. That one's own insecurity should be addressed, not projected onto a partner. That no one has the right to demand passwords, monitor conversations, dictate clothing choices, exert sexual pressure, or decide who another person can associate with. 

Sex education must include a deep reflection on consent, respect, equality, and emotional management. It's not enough to simply say "don't control." We must help people understand what lies behind the need to control, how to build a healthy relationship, how to manage jealousy, how to communicate discomfort without aggression, and how to accept that the other person has their own life. 

It's also important to work on group responsibility. Many violent behaviors persist because the environment tolerates, minimizes, or even celebrates them. Friends may laugh at sexist comments, justify controlling attitudes, or turn a blind eye to humiliating behavior. Educating boys also involves teaching them not to be complicit, to question these dynamics, and to intervene when they detect harmful behavior in their group. 

Families and professionals: supporting without intruding 

When a family or professional suspects that a teenager may be in an abusive relationship, the approach is crucial. An overly harsh reaction can provoke rejection. Simply forbidding the relationship, taking away the phone, insulting the partner, or pressuring the girl to break up immediately can cause her to withdraw, hide more information, or defend the relationship even more. 

Support should combine firmness and care. Firmness to name what is happening and not normalize control. Care to avoid blaming the teenager or making her feel naive or responsible. It is important to convey that what she is experiencing is not healthy love, but also that she is not alone and can speak without fear. 

Open-ended questions are often more helpful than accusations. Instead of saying, “Your boyfriend is abusive and you have to leave him,” it can be more effective to ask: “How do you feel when he gets angry?”, “Have you stopped doing things you used to enjoy to avoid problems?”, “Do you feel you can be yourself in the relationship?”, “Are you afraid to tell him about certain plans?”, “Do you feel free?”. These questions allow the teenager herself to begin examining the relationship. 

It's also important to strengthen her support network. Violence tends to isolate. That's why rebuilding relationships with friends, family, trusted educators, or professionals can be an essential part of the process. The teenager needs to feel that she has other spaces, other perspectives, and other forms of support beyond her partner. 

In educational, protection, or social intervention settings, professional teams must have clear protocols for detection and action. It's not just about addressing cases when violence is already evident, but about creating preventative spaces where healthy relationships, consent, social media, jealousy, control, and self-esteem can be discussed. Prevention cannot be reduced to a single talk on November 25th. It must be part of ongoing emotional education. 

The importance of naming violence without blaming 

Naming violence is essential. If it isn't named, it becomes invisible. But naming it doesn't mean hastily labeling or imposing a narrative that the adolescent can't yet accept. Often, the process of becoming aware is gradual. First comes discomfort. Then doubt. Later, the identification of specific behaviors. Finally, the understanding that the relationship was harmful or violent may emerge. 

During this process, language matters. Telling a girl “how could you let that happen” or “I warned you” can increase her shame. And shame is a huge barrier to asking for help. In contrast, messages like “what you’re going through happens to many girls,” “it’s not your fault,” “no one has the right to control you,” or “we can find help together” open a door. 

Gender-based violence among adolescents should not be addressed with sensationalism or alarmism, but rather with a sense of educational responsibility. We must avoid both minimization and paralyzing dramatization. Minimizing prevents action. Dramatizing without support can generate fear or inaction. The key is to help identify, protect, repair, and prevent gender-based violence. 

It's also important to keep in mind that a teenager may return to her partner after having disclosed serious situations. This doesn't mean she lied or that she doesn't need help. It's part of the complexity of many abusive relationships. Emotional dependence, fear, the hope for change, and social pressure can make the breakup anything but straightforward. That's why support should continue even when the girl makes decisions that adults don't understand or agree with. 

Educating children about healthy relationships. 

Preventing gender-based violence in teenage relationships doesn't begin when the first relationship occurs. It begins much earlier, in the way we educate about the body, boundaries, emotions, equality, and respect. 

From childhood, children can be taught that no one has the right to invade our space, that saying "no" is legitimate, that caring is not controlling, and that loving someone does not mean obeying them. They can also be taught co-responsibility, empathy, and peaceful conflict resolution. Children learn not only from what they are told, but also from what they see. They observe how adults treat each other, how tasks are divided, how disagreements are handled, how men and women are discussed, and how emotions are validated or ridiculed. 

During adolescence, this education needs to be more explicit. We must talk about relationships, desire, consent, boundaries, social media, pornography, peer pressure, and online violence. Avoiding these topics doesn't protect teenagers; it leaves them vulnerable to much more powerful and readily available narratives, many of which are deeply sexist or distorted. 

Educating for healthy relationships means teaching that a partner shouldn't fill a void, but rather accompany a life that already has value. That trust isn't demonstrated by surrendering intimacy. That love doesn't demand constant proof. That a relationship can end, and that doesn't make anyone a failure. That conflicts are discussed, not imposed. That the other person's freedom isn't a threat, but an essential condition for a healthy bond. 

To love cannot mean to lose oneself 

Gender-based violence in teenage relationships compels us to examine closely the earliest forms of love. Not to control the emotional lives of adolescents, but to better support them. Not to instill fear, but to offer tools. Not to deny the intensity of their emotions, but to help them distinguish between intensity and harm. 

A teenage girl who's constantly worried about her partner's anger isn't in a healthy relationship. A girl who changes her style, withdraws from her friends, or gives out her passwords for fear of an argument isn't being cared for; she's being controlled. A boy who feels the need to monitor, impose his will, or pressure others isn't showing love; he's exerting power. 

The educational challenge lies in dismantling these misconceptions. It means repeating, as often as necessary, that jealousy is not a sign of love, that control is not protection, that possession is not commitment, and that violence doesn't always begin with physical violence. Sometimes it starts with "I don't like you going out," with "send me your location," with "if you loved me, you would do it.". 

In response, families, schools, professionals, and the community have a shared responsibility: to create spaces where adolescents can talk about their relationships without fear, review their ideas about love, recognize warning signs, and build bonds based on equality. 

Because love shouldn't mean losing freedom. Love shouldn't diminish a person. Love shouldn't be frightening. And if a relationship demands you stop being yourself to maintain it, then it's not love: it's control.

 

Would you like to study these and other current topics related to childhood and adolescent development? Learn about the Postgraduate in Intervention with Minors and work on what you really like!

mediación

When mediation is the only solution 

By Juan Diego Mata Why, in many cases, a sentence is not enough and an agreement becomes essential 1. The problem: resolutions that do not bring peace There is something profoundly paradoxical in the contemporary judicial system: we obtain sentences, but we do not always obtain solutions. That is, the conflict is resolved on the basis of… Read more