In many schools, this scene is repeating itself with increasing frequency: a student accumulates disciplinary reports, classroom dynamics deteriorate, and finally, temporary expulsion is implemented as a corrective measure. On paper, the procedure is clear. In practice, however, the question that more and more professionals are asking is different: what happens next?
Expulsion remains a legitimate tool within the regulatory framework of schools. The problem lies not in its existence, but in its increasingly frequent use as an almost automatic response to certain disruptive behaviors. When this occurs, the education system gains time in the short term, but often simply shifts the problem to other areas that are not always equipped to handle it.
A symptom that is becoming visible
Guidance teams, social services, and child protection agencies share a common perception: more minors are arriving with histories of progressive school disengagement. It's not always a case of formal dropout, but rather something more gradual and difficult to detect. First come repeated conflicts in the classroom, then accumulated sanctions, later expulsions, and finally, a growing disconnection from the educational process.
This trajectory is not due to a single cause. In some cases, there are clear behavioral regulation difficulties; in others, there are histories of previous school disengagement, highly stressful family contexts, or accumulated negative educational experiences. The worrying aspect is that, when expulsion becomes the predominant response, the system misses opportunities to intervene before the breakdown becomes more significant.
The function of expulsion… and its limits
Let's be clear: disciplinary measures have a role in school life. Schools need tools to protect coexistence and guarantee the right to education for all students. The problem arises when expulsion is used as the primary response in situations that require more than a temporary sanction.
Practical evidence shows that, in certain cases, expulsion does not correct the behavior, but rather intensifies or perpetuates it. The child leaves the classroom for a few days, but returns without having changed the underlying pattern. Sometimes they come back with more frustration, greater disengagement, and a stronger sense of institutional rejection.
When this happens repeatedly, expulsion ceases to be an educational measure and begins to function as an emergency management mechanism.
The displacement effect
One of the less visible but most relevant phenomena is the displacement of the problem to other systems. Minors who accumulate prolonged expulsions spend more time outside the structured school environment, which increases the risk of:
- greater exposure to risky contexts,
- increase in family conflict,
- emergence of disruptive behaviors outside the educational setting,
- subsequent referrals to social services or juvenile justice.
Professionals in these fields describe it with some clarity: they are receiving more and more cases where school disengagement has been an important factor in the escalation of the conflict.
This does not mean that the school is solely responsible for these processes, but it does occupy a key position in detecting, containing and redirecting trajectories before they become complicated.
What the centers are asking for (and what they can offer)
Teachers and school administrators often work with high student-teacher ratios, heavy curriculum demands, and limited support resources. Expecting schools to single-handedly handle highly complex behavioral situations is unrealistic. In fact, part of the increase in expulsions stems from a perceived lack of resources to manage certain student profiles within the regular classroom.
Herein lies one of the key issues of the present moment: the need for shared solutions. Neither can the school handle all complex cases alone, nor can expulsion become the default exit strategy.
When there are well-coordinated guidance teams, behavioral support programs, and smooth channels with social services, the room for maneuver changes considerably. The problem is that this network functions very unevenly across different regions.
Professionals who move between systems
For those working with minors, the growing link between school conflict and referrals to other resources is a field that increasingly demands technical understanding. It is not enough to intervene only when the minor has already left the education system; understanding what happened along the way is crucial.
This involves knowing how to read school reports, understanding coexistence protocols, coordinating with schools and, above all, avoiding simplistic views that reduce the problem to "lack of rules" or "bad attitude of the minor".
Experience shows that, behind many trajectories of repeated expulsion, there are processes of progressive disengagement that could have been addressed earlier with more appropriate responses.
Open the focus without losing balance
The debate about school expulsions shouldn't be framed in terms of prohibiting or permitting. The fundamental issue is how these measures are used and what real alternatives exist for cases that are systematically repeated.
Strengthening support within the education system, improving inter-institutional coordination, and providing professionals with specific tools for managing complex behaviors are lines of work that are beginning to gain importance on the technical agenda.
Meanwhile, in many resources the feeling is clear: every poorly handled expulsion today can become a more complex case tomorrow.
A shared challenge
What is happening in classrooms is not a problem exclusive to the education system. It is an early indicator of trajectories that, if not addressed in a coordinated manner, can become more complicated over time. Therefore, it is increasingly important that professionals in the socio-educational field have a good understanding of these dynamics and know how to intervene before disengagement becomes more pronounced.
Working with children today also means looking at what happens inside the school, even when the main intervention takes place outside of it. Because that's often where the first warning signs begin to appear.
Would you like to study these and other current topics related to childhood and adolescent development? Learn about the Postgraduate in Intervention with Minors and work on what you really like!
